Device Therapies Among Patients Receiving Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in the Cardiovascular Research Network.

BACKGROUND: Primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduce mortality in selected patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction by delivering therapies (antitachycardia pacing or shocks) to terminate potentially lethal arrhythmias; inappropriate therapies also occur. We assessed device therapies among adults receiving primary prevention ICDs in 7 healthcare systems. METHODS AND RESULTS: We linked medical record data, adjudicated device therapies, and the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD Registry. Survival analysis evaluated therapy probability and predictors after ICD implant from 2006 to 2009, with attention to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Coverage With Evidence Development subgroups: left ventricular ejection fraction, 31% to 35%; nonischemic cardiomyopathy <9 months' duration; and New York Heart Association class IV heart failure with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator. Among 2540 patients, 35% were <65 years old, 26% were women, and 59% were white. During 27 (median) months, 738 (29%) received ≥1 therapy. Three-year therapy risk was 36% (appropriate, 24%; inappropriate, 12%). Appropriate therapy was more common in men (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43-2.35). Inappropriate therapy was more common in patients with atrial fibrillation (adjusted HR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.68-2.87), but less common among patients ≥65 years old versus younger (adjusted HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.95) and in recent implants (eg, in 2009 versus 2006; adjusted HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.95). In Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Coverage With Evidence Development analysis, inappropriate therapy was less common with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator versus single chamber (adjusted HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36-0.84); therapy risk did not otherwise differ for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Coverage With Evidence Development subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In this community cohort of primary prevention patients receiving ICD, therapy delivery varied across demographic and clinical characteristics, but did not differ meaningfully for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Coverage With Evidence Development subgroups.

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on risk of myocardial infarction from the use of oral direct thrombin inhibitors.

Dabigatran has been associated with greater risk of myocardial infarction (MI) than warfarin. It is unknown whether the increased risk is unique to dabigatran, an adverse effect shared by other oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs), or the result of a protective effect of warfarin against MI. To address these questions, we systematically searched MEDLINE and performed a meta-analysis on randomized trials that compared oral DTIs with warfarin for any indication with end point of MIs after randomization. We furthermore performed a secondary meta-analysis on atrial fibrillation stroke prevention trials with alternative anticoagulants compared with warfarin with end point of MIs after randomization. A total of 11 trials (39,357 patients) that compared warfarin to DTIs (dabigatran, ximelagatran, and AZD0837) were identified. In these trials, patients treated with oral DTIs were more likely to experience an MI than their counterparts treated with warfarin (285 of 23,333 vs 133 of 16,024, odds ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 1.66, p = 0.005). For secondary analysis, 8 studies (69,615 patients) were identified that compared warfarin with alternative anticoagulant including factor Xa inhibitors, DTIs, aspirin, and clopidogrel. There was no significant advantage in the rate of MIs with the use of warfarin versus comparators (odds ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 1.34, p = 0.59). In conclusion, our data suggest that oral DTIs were associated with increased risk of MI. This increased risk appears to be a class effect of these agents, not a specific phenomenon unique to dabigatran or protective effect of warfarin. These findings support the need for enhanced postmarket surveillance of oral DTIs and other novel agents.

Longitudinal study of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: methods and clinical characteristics of patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for primary prevention in contemporary practice.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are increasingly used for primary prevention after randomized, controlled trials demonstrating that they reduce the risk of death in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The extent to which the clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of unselected, community-based patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction undergoing primary prevention ICD implantation in a real-world setting compare with those enrolled in the randomized, controlled trials is not well characterized. This study is being conducted to address these questions. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study cohort includes consecutive patients undergoing primary prevention ICD placement between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2009 in 7 health plans. Baseline clinical characteristics were acquired from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD Registry. Longitudinal data collection is underway, and will include hospitalization, mortality, and resource use from standardized health plan data archives. Data regarding ICD therapies will be obtained through chart abstraction and adjudicated by a panel of experts in device therapy. Compared with the populations of primary prevention ICD therapy randomized, controlled trials, the cohort (n=2621) is on average significantly older (by 2.5-6.5 years), more often female, more often from racial and ethnic minority groups, and has a higher burden of coexisting conditions. The cohort is similar, however, to a national population undergoing primary prevention ICD placement. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing primary prevention ICD implantation in this study differ from those enrolled in the randomized, controlled trials that established the efficacy of ICDs. Understanding a broad range of health outcomes, including ICD therapies, will provide patients, clinicians, and policy makers with contemporary data to inform decision-making.

Predicting atrial fibrillation and flutter using electronic health records.

Electronic Health Records (EHR) contain large amounts of useful information that could potentially be used for building models for predicting onset of diseases. In this study, we have investigated the use of free-text and coded data in Marshfield Clinic's EHR, individually and in combination for building machine learning based models to predict the first ever episode of atrial fibrillation and/or atrial flutter (AFF). We trained and evaluated our AFF models on the EHR data across different time intervals (1, 3, 5 and all years) prior to first documented onset of AFF. We applied several machine learning methods, including naïve bayes, support vector machines (SVM), logistic regression and random forests for building AFF prediction models and evaluated these using 10-fold cross-validation approach. On text-based datasets, the best model achieved an F-measure of 60.1%, when applied exclusively to coded data. The combination of textual and coded data achieved comparable performance. The study results attest to the relative merit of utilizing textual data to complement the use of coded data for disease onset prediction modeling.

Discrimination against international medical graduates in the United States residency program selection process.

BACKGROUND: Available evidence suggests that international medical graduates have improved the availability of U.S. health care while maintaining academic standards. We wondered whether studies had been conducted to address how international graduates were treated in the post-graduate selection process compared to U.S. graduates. METHODS: We conducted a Medline search for research on the selection process. RESULTS: Two studies provide strong evidence that psychiatry and family practice programs respond to identical requests for applications at least 80% more often for U.S. medical graduates than for international graduates. In a third study, a survey of surgical program directors, over 70% perceived that there was discrimination against international graduates in the selection process. CONCLUSIONS: There is sufficient evidence to support action against discrimination in the selection process. Medical organizations should publish explicit proscriptions of discrimination against international medical graduates (as the American Psychiatric Association has done) and promote them in diversity statements. They should develop uniform and transparent policies for program directors to use to select applicants that minimize the possibility of non-academic discrimination, and the accreditation organization should monitor whether it is occurring. Whether there should be protectionism for U.S. graduates or whether post-graduate medical education should be an unfettered meritocracy needs to be openly discussed by medicine and society.

Use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators for primary prevention in the community: do women and men equally meet trial enrollment criteria?

BACKGROUND: Fewer women than men undergo implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. The criteria used to select patients for ICD implantation may be more permissive among men than for women. We hypothesized that women who undergo primary prevention ICD implantation more often meet strict trial enrollment criteria for this therapy. METHODS: We studied 59,812 patients in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD registry undergoing initial primary prevention ICD placement between January 2005 and April 2007. Patients were classified as meeting or not meeting enrollment criteria of either the MADIT-II or SCD-HeFT trials. Multivariable analyses assessed the association between gender and concordance with trial criteria adjusting for demographic, clinical, and system characteristics. RESULTS: Among the cohort, 27% (n = 16,072) were women. Overall, 85.2% of women and 84.5% of men met enrollment criteria of either trial (P = .05). In multivariable analyses, women were equally likely to meet trial criteria (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.99-1.10) than men. Significantly more women than men met the trial enrollment criteria among patients older than age 65 (86.6% of women vs 85.3% of men, OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.19), but this difference was not found among younger patients (82.5% of women vs 83.0% of men, OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89-1.07). CONCLUSIONS: In a national cohort undergoing primary prevention ICD implantation, older women were only slightly more likely then men to meet the enrollment criteria for MADIT II or SCD-HeFT. Relative overutilization in men is not an important explanation for gender differences in ICD implantation.

Gender differences in procedure-related adverse events in patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy.

BACKGROUND: Women are at higher risk than men for adverse events with certain invasive cardiac procedures. Our objective was to compare rates of in-hospital adverse events in men and women receiving implantable cardioverter- defibrillator (ICD) therapy in community practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD Registry, we identified patients undergoing first-time ICD implantation between January 2006 and December 2007. Outcomes included in-hospital adverse events after ICD implantation. Multivariable analysis assessed the association between gender and in-hospital adverse events, with adjustment for demographic, clinical, procedural, physician, and hospital characteristics. Of 161,470 patients, 73% were male, and 27% were female. Women were more likely to have a history of heart failure (81% versus 77%, P<0.01), worse New York Heart Association functional status (57% versus 50% in class III and IV, P<0.01), and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (44% versus 27%, P<0.01) and were more likely to receive biventricular ICDs (39% versus 34%, P<0.01). In unadjusted analyses, women were more likely to experience any adverse event (4.4% versus 3.3%, P<0.001) and major adverse events (2.0% versus 1.1%, P<0.001). In multivariable models, women had a significantly higher risk of any adverse event (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.39) and major adverse events (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.57 to 1.86). CONCLUSIONS: Women are more likely than men to have in-hospital adverse events related to ICD implantation. Efforts are needed to understand the reasons for higher ICD implantation-related adverse event rates in women and to develop strategies to reduce the risk of these events.

CYP4F2 genetic variant alters required warfarin dose.

Warfarin is an effective, commonly prescribed anticoagulant used to treat and prevent thrombotic events. Because of historically high rates of drug-associated adverse events, warfarin remains underprescribed. Further, interindividual variability in therapeutic dose mandates frequent monitoring until target anticoagulation is achieved. Genetic polymorphisms involved in warfarin metabolism and sensitivity have been implicated in variability of dose. Here, we describe a novel variant that influences warfarin requirements. To identify additional genetic variants that contribute to warfarin requirements, screening of DNA variants in additional genes that code for drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transport proteins was undertaken using the Affymetrix drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters panel. A DNA variant (rs2108622; V433M) in cytochrome P450 4F2 (CYP4F2) was associated with warfarin dose in 3 independent white cohorts of patients stabilized on warfarin representing diverse geographic regions in the United States and accounted for a difference in warfarin dose of approximately 1 mg/day between CC and TT subjects. Genetic variation of CYP4F2 was associated with a clinically relevant effect on warfarin requirement.

Evaluation of genetic factors for warfarin dose prediction.

OBJECTIVES: Warfarin is a commonly prescribed anticoagulant drug used to prevent thromboses that may arise as a consequence of orthopedic and vascular surgery or underlying cardiovascular disease. Warfarin is associated with a notoriously narrow therapeutic window where small variations in dosing may result in hemorrhagic or thrombotic complications. To ultimately improve dosing of warfarin, we evaluated models for stable maintenance dose that incorporated both clinical and genetic factors. METHOD: A model was constructed by evaluating the contribution to dosing variability of the following clinical factors: age, gender, body surface area, and presence or absence of prosthetic heart valves or diabetes. The model was then sequentially expanded by incorporating polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9; vitamin K 2,3 epoxide reductase complex, subunit 1 (VKORC1); gamma carboxylase; factor VII; and apolipoprotein (Apo) E genes. RESULTS: Of genetic factors evaluated in the model, CYP2C9 and VKORC1 each contributed substantially to dose variability, and together with clinical factors explained 56% of the individual variability in stable warfarin dose. In contrast, gamma carboxylase, factor VII and Apo E polymorphisms contributed little to dose variability. CONCLUSION: The importance of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 to patient-specific dose of warfarin has been confirmed, while polymorphisms of gamma carboxylase, factor VII and Apo E genes did not substantially contribute to predictive models for stable warfarin dose.

Implantable cardiac defibrillator placement in a patient with persistent left superior vena cava and Brugada syndrome.

A 45-year-old man was diagnosed with new-onset atrial fibrillation. Control of ventricular rate led to spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm. Subsequent electrocardiograms revealed ST segment changes characteristic of Brugada syndrome. Electrophysiology study demonstrated inducible ventricular fibrillation. During the placement of an implantable cardiac defibrillator the patient was found to have a persistent left superior vena cava. Persistent left superior vena cava is present in 0.3% of cases in autopsy series. To date, persistent left superior vena cava has not been reported in association with Brugada syndrome. We report such a case.

Impact of age, CYP2C9 genotype and concomitant medication on the rate of rise for prothrombin time during the first 30 days of warfarin therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the impact of several important clinical variables on the rate of anticoagulation during warfarin initiation (i.e., the first 30 days). DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: An anticoagulation service of a large horizontally integrated, multispecialty group practice in central and northern Wisconsin. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with sufficient laboratory data obtained during the initiation phase of warfarin treatment. METHODS: Patients were consented and genotyped for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 polymorphisms. Anticoagulation laboratory data were then electronically abstracted and fitted to a logistic growth model. Rate of anticoagulation was compared between groups. RESULTS: During warfarin initiation, the mean slope for rise in International Normalized Ratio (INR) of prothrombin time was significantly associated with age (p = 0.03, n = 166). Because a relationship between diabetes and warfarin dosing has been suggested previously, we assessed the impact of this comorbidity in our model as well. Diabetes showed relatively little impact, but concomitant treatment with an anti-diabetic sulfonylurea medication was associated with an increase in slope (3-fold, p < 0.05). Since this drug interaction may occur at the level of CYP2C9, we also assessed the impact of CYP2C9 genotype in our model. The impact of CYP2C9 genotype was marginally significant (p = 0.119, non-pooled dataset; p = 0.053, data pooled for CYP2C9 *2/*2, *2/*3 and *3/*3). CONCLUSIONS: Age and concomitant sulfonylurea therapy alter the rate of anticoagulation during the first 30 days of warfarin therapy.

Comparison of management patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation in Canada and the United States (from the analysis of the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management [AFFIRM] database).

Little is known about differences in practice patterns or outcomes in the management of patients who have atrial fibrillation in Canada compared with those in the United States (US). We evaluated the effect that the country of enrollment may have on the management patterns and clinical outcomes in patients who participated in the AFFIRM study. Three thousand four hundred patients came from the US and 660 from Canada. In the US, patients were more likely to have a history of coronary artery disease (39% vs 35%, p = 0.03), hypertension (72% vs 67%, p = 0.01), or congestive heart failure (24% vs 18%, p = 0.0002). More US participants were <65 years of age (25% vs 19%, p = 0.003). Although at randomization the use of warfarin was comparable, during follow-up Canadians were more likely to be treated with warfarin and to be therapeutically anticoagulated. Mortality rate at 5 years was higher in US patients (24% vs 16%, p = 0.001), and the composite end point (death, disabling stroke, major bleeding, cardiac arrest, or anoxic encephalopathy) was also higher in US patients (30% vs 22%, p = 0.0005). Even after adjusting for known differences in baseline characteristics, the risk of death was lower in Canada (hazard ratio 0.70, p = 0.02). In conclusion, in the AFFIRM study, US subjects were more likely to have preexisting cardiovascular diseases despite being younger (<65 years old) than those in Canada. Effective warfarin therapy was more commonly employed in Canada. After correcting for the known differences in baseline characteristics, Canadian patients who had atrial fibrillation had a lower mortality risk.

A prospective, randomized pilot trial of model-based warfarin dose initiation using CYP2C9 genotype and clinical data.

BACKGROUND: Rapid genetic screening for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 variants may play a role in improving the efficacy and safety of warfarin in individuals with CYP2C9 variants. The feasibility of prospective CYP2C9 model-based warfarin dosing has not yet been assessed. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of applying a CYP2C9 gene-based warfarin dosing model in clinical practice. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical pilot trial. SETTING: Large multispecialty group practice. PATIENTS: Candidates were recruited from a list of clinic patients eligible for warfarin initiation. This included patients with newly diagnosed thromboembolic disease or atrial arrhythmia, as well as patients anticipating elective valvuloplasty or arthroplasty. Patients who previously received warfarin were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomized to receive either 1) a standard initiation dose of 5 mg warfarin/day, or 2) rapid CYP2C9 genotyping and an initiation dose determined using parameters estimated from a previously published multivariate model [including age, body size, co-morbidity (e.g., diabetes), clinical indication (e.g., valvuloplasty) and CYP2C9 genotype]. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome measurements were patient willingness to participate, physician willingness to refer, sample processing time, ability to administer calculated dosage and adequacy of follow-up. LIMITATIONS: This pilot trial was designed to assess the feasibility of model-based warfarin dosing. Power was insufficient for statistical comparison of adverse event rates. RESULTS: Forty-three of 117 patients had no prior warfarin treatment and were eligible. Five declined to participate. Twenty patients were randomized to a standard initiation dose of 5 mg daily. Eighteen patients were randomized to model-based dosing. All but one participant received the assigned initiation dose. Blood draw to dosage calculation time (including genotyping) required approximately 4 hours. Six adverse events occurred within the standard dosing group, and two adverse events occurred within the model-based dosing group. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective application of a multivariate CYP2C9 gene-based warfarin dosing model is feasible.

Rate control vs. rhythm control in the management of atrial fibrillation in elderly persons.

Antiarrhythmic medications used to maintain sinus rhythm have long been the treatment of choice in atrial fibrillation. The results of five prospective randomized trials comparing the efficacy and safety of rhythm-control to rate-control strategies are now available. Reflecting the epidemiology of atrial fibrillation in the real world, most subjects enrolled in these investigations were elderly persons at increased risk of stroke or death. All of these trials have had similar results; these studies have failed to demonstrate a clear advantage of one treatment strategy over the other. A prespecified subgroup analysis among 3091 elderly patients in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study revealed that rhythm control was associated with a higher risk of death than rate control. This review examines developments leading to and the implications and limitations of these trials and discusses recently issued practice guidelines and the justification for ongoing efforts to develop nonpharmacologic approaches to rhythm management in atrial fibrillation.

Familial atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia.

Dual atrioventricular nodal pathways, the substrate responsible for atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia (AVNRT), are thought to be randomly occurring congenital anomalies. This article describes 14 patients in six families, each with two or three first-degree relatives with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Electrophysiological evidence of dual atrioventricular nodal pathways was established in all 13 patients studied, AVNRT was induced in 12 (92%), and radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway was curative in all cases. The data suggest a hereditary contribution to the development of atrioventricular nodal pathways and AVNRT. The pattern of inheritance appears to be autosomal dominant.

Hyperventilation-induced syncope: no need to panic.

Accurately diagnosing and treating adult patients presenting with recurrent syncope can be extremely problematic. We present the case of a patient who presented with recurrent syncope. We propose that many cases currently classified as idiopathic may in fact be due to orthostatic hypotension secondary to hyperventilation, or simply hyperventilation-induced syncope. The presence of undiagnosed psychiatric disorders should be considered in these patients.